CoD: World at War

[Zoey]

Any played it? Is it any good as Mordern Warfare? o_o

I dunno, I think they did a great job on the whole futuristic theme, they should've kept it and let other games like 'Medal of Honor' keep WW2.

[Mendi-chan]

World War II is an overdone genre, my friend. CoD: WaW is an mediocre game at best. Basically take your good ole' CoD4 game and paint a WW II cameo on it and you have the gist of the entire World at War game. The weapons, as expected with a trip to the past, feel substantially worse than the Modern Warfare arsenal. In addition to feeling a bit more inaccurate, they seem to do just a bit less damage. The kill streak bonuses are still there in the form of Recon Planes (UAVs), Artillery Strikes (Air Strikes), and... War Dogs? o_O

In any case...

Unless you are completely bored with CoD4, I'd say it's time to wait it out until CoD5. World at War = bust. x_X

[Zoey]

I have no problems with people trying the same thing over and over. It's just that for pete's sake, do it right! Theres million of WW2 and only a handful that are worthy of mentioning (Medal of Honor, CoD, Company of Heroes). That's really sad.
But from what I assumed and you kinda verified it, my brothers X-Mas present won't be that enjoyable o_o